
Inspired last night, I opened Walden to read an excerpt and then do some writing on that excerpt. One of the first things I read was a sentence containing Thoreau's observations on a winter's night. He hears geese landing on the pond as he is walking back "from the village at ten or eleven o'clock at night" (211, Thoreau).
Immediately debates on Thoreau and his experiment came to mind and were thwarted with this sentence. Oh wait, you're not familiar with the debate on Thoreau surrounding his two years at Walden pond? Let me fill you in.
Thoreau went to Walden pond to live off the land and to "live deliberately" (101, Thoreau). It is from this one word - deliberate - that the whole debate sprang. People not completely Thoreau-ifites (aka. readers of ALL of Walden, and many other of his works) heard tell of his adventures of giving up society and heading to the woods to make his life and instantly ran wild with the idea. A man who gave up everything to scratch a living from nothing?!?! Thoreau became the instant Green Movement Hero. Thoreau-ifites knew better and probably saw his fall from grace coming years before it did, but could do nothing to stop it.
Sooner rather than later, it came out that Thoreau did not completely shun society. He may have *gasp* visited his mother where he ate dinner with her and did his LAUNDRY! And, oh horror, partook in a brewed beverage now and then admist the company of others! Non-Thoreau-ifites immediately went up in arms about this subject and began denouncing their so-called hero. How could he have lied to them thus? Misled them with nary a mention of any of his public traipsings in any of his journals, or Walden, or in The Maine Woods? He was supposed to be ALONE with NOTHING and making it work, DAMN IT!
With that very first sentence I read, "upon returning from the village at ten or eleven o'clock at night," I was reminded that Thoreau did not lie or mislead anyone. If people really read Walden, THOREAUHLY (ha!), there are moments like this one that show he was never far from Concord and civilization and he was not shunning either's company. Thoreau went to the woods not to start from scratch to live, nor to build everything from only what was available on hand in those woods (check out the whole FIRST chapter entitled Economy). Instead, Thoreau tried to "live deep and suck out all the marrow of life," to "live so sturidly and Spartan-like" that he would shed "all that was not life" and get to life's fundamentals - in today's terms, he was simplifying.
Thoreau "reduced [life] to its lowest terms" to see "if [life] proved mean" or sublime (101, Thoreau). Then, either way, he would revel and get "the whole and genuine[ness]" of that experience, and "publish it...to the world" (101, Thoreau).
So, all you Thoreau haters and slanderers, get your Walden out and re-read that bit on "What I Lived For" and then with a microscopic intent, read the WHOLE THING and you will see that Henry D. is still the same man he always was...a leader in voluntary simplicity, his works a study of his effects on his world and the effects of his world on him. Everything the green movement touts and celebrates and embraces.
You've still got it, Thoreau. Rock on with your greeeen self.
(me and henry D. @ Walden Pond, 2008)









